Friday, March 1, 2013

How do bacteria clog medical devices? Very quickly

Mar. 1, 2013 ? A new study has exam?ined how bac?te?ria clog med?ical devices, and the result isn't pretty. The microbes join to cre?ate slimy rib?bons that tan?gle and trap other pass?ing bac?te?ria, cre?at?ing a full block?age in a star?tlingly short period of time.

The find?ing could help shape strate?gies for pre?vent?ing clog?ging of devices such as stents -- which are implanted in the body to keep open blood ves?sels and pas?sages -- as well as water fil?ters and other items that are sus?cep?ti?ble to con?t?a?m?i?na?tion. The research was pub?lished in Pro?ceed?ings of the National Acad?emy of Sciences.

Click on the image to view movie. Over a period of about 40 hours, bac?te?r?ial cells (green) flowed through a chan?nel, form?ing a green biofilm on the walls. Over the next ten hours, researchers sent red bac?te?r?ial cells through the chan?nel. The red cells became stuck in the sticky biofilm and began to form thin red stream?ers. Once stuck, these stream?ers in turn trapped addi?tional cells, lead?ing to rapid clog?ging. (Image source: Knut Drescher)

Using time-lapse imag?ing, researchers at Prince?ton Uni?ver?sity mon?i?tored fluid flow in nar?row tubes or pores sim?i?lar to those used in water fil?ters and med?ical devices. Unlike pre?vi?ous stud?ies, the Prince?ton exper?i?ment more closely mim?ic?ked the nat?ural fea?tures of the devices, using rough rather than smooth sur?faces and pressure-driven fluid instead of non-moving fluid.

The team of biol?o?gists and engi?neers intro?duced a small num?ber of bac?te?ria known to be com?mon con?t?a?m?i?nants of med?ical devices. Over a period of about 40 hours, the researchers observed that some of the microbes -- dyed green for vis?i?bil?ity -- attached to the inner wall of the tube and began to mul?ti?ply, even?tu?ally form?ing a slimy coat?ing called a biofilm. These films con?sist of thou?sands of indi?vid?ual cells held together by a sort of bio?log?i?cal glue.

Over the next sev?eral hours, the researchers sent addi?tional microbes, dyed red, into the tube. These red cells became stuck to the biofilm-coated walls, where the force of the flow?ing liq?uid shaped the trapped cells into stream?ers that rip?pled in the liq?uid like flags rip?pling in a breeze. Dur?ing this time, the fluid flow slowed only slightly.

At about 55 hours into the exper?i?ment, the biofilm stream?ers tan?gled with each other, form?ing a net-like bar?rier that trapped addi?tional bac?te?r?ial cells, cre?at?ing a larger bar?rier which in turn ensnared more cells. Within an hour, the entire tube became blocked and the fluid flow stopped.

The study was con?ducted by lead author Knut Drescher with assis?tance from tech?ni?cian Yi Shen. Drescher is a post?doc?toral research asso?ciate work?ing with Bon?nie Bassler, Princeton's Squibb Pro?fes?sor in Mol?e?c?u?lar Biol?ogy and a Howard Hughes Med?ical Insti?tute Inves?ti?ga?tor, and Howard Stone, Princeton's Don?ald R. Dixon '69 and Eliz?a?beth W. Dixon Pro?fes?sor of Mechan?i?cal and Aero?space Engineering.

"For me the sur?prise was how quickly the biofilm stream?ers caused com?plete clog?ging," said Stone. "There was no warn?ing that some?thing bad was about to happen."

By con?struct?ing their own con?trolled envi?ron?ment, the researchers demon?strated that rough sur?faces and pres?sure dri?ven flow are char?ac?ter?is?tics of nature and need to be taken into account exper?i?men?tally. The researchers used stents, soil-based fil?ters and water fil?ters to prove that the biofilm streams indeed form in real sce?nar?ios and likely explain why devices fail.

The work also allowed the researchers to explore which bac?te?r?ial genes con?tribute to biofilm streamer for?ma?tion. Pre?vi?ous stud?ies, con?ducted under non-realistic con?di?tions, iden?ti?fied sev?eral genes involved in for?ma?tion of the biofilm stream?ers. The Prince?ton researchers found that some of those pre?vi?ously iden?ti?fied genes were not needed for biofilm streamer for?ma?tion in the more real?is?tic habitat.

This work was sup?ported by the Howard Hughes Med?ical Insti?tute, National Insti?tutes of Health grant 5R01GM065859, National Sci?ence Foun?da?tion (NSF) grant MCB-0343821, NSF grant MCB-1119232, and the Human Fron?tier Sci?ence Program.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Princeton University.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. K. Drescher, Y. Shen, B. L. Bassler, H. A. Stone. Biofilm streamers cause catastrophic disruption of flow with consequences for environmental and medical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300321110

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_health/~3/jF0IQFyD8eU/130301131127.htm

Caleb Moore House of Cards Warm Bodies Colin Kaepernick cbs sports 30 rock Chris Culliver

Viruses can have immune systems: A pirate phage commandeers the immune system of bacteria

Feb. 27, 2013 ? A study published today in the journal Nature reports that a viral predator of the cholera bacteria has stolen the functional immune system of bacteria and is using it against its bacterial host. The study provides the first evidence that this type of virus, the bacteriophage ("phage" for short), can acquire a wholly functional and adaptive immune system.

The phage used the stolen immune system to disable -- and thus overcome -- the cholera bacteria's defense system against phages. Therefore, the phage can kill the cholera bacteria and multiply to produce more phage offspring, which can then kill more cholera bacteria. The study has dramatic implications for phage therapy, which is the use of phages to treat bacterial diseases. Developing phage therapy is particularly important because some bacteria, called superbugs, are resistant to most or all current antibiotics.

Until now, scientists thought phages existed only as primitive particles of DNA or RNA and therefore lacked the sophistication of an adaptive immune system, which is a system that can respond rapidly to a nearly infinite variety of new challenges. Phages are viruses that prey exclusively on bacteria and each phage is parasitically mated to a specific type of bacteria. This study focused on a phage that attacks Vibrio cholerae, the bacterium responsible for cholera epidemics in humans.

Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Andrew Camilli, Ph.D., of Tufts University School of Medicine led the research team responsible for the surprising discovery.

First author Kimberley D. Seed, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in Camilli's lab, was analyzing DNA sequences of phages taken from stool samples from patients with cholera in Bangladesh when she identified genes for a functional immune system previously found only in some bacteria (and most Archaea, a separate domain of single-celled microorganisms).

To verify the findings, the researchers used phage lacking the adaptive immune system to infect a new strain of cholera bacteria that is naturally resistant to the phage. The phage were unable to adapt to and kill the cholera strain. They next infected the same strain of cholera bacteria with phage harboring the immune system, and observed that the phage rapidly adapted and thus gained the ability to kill the cholera bacteria. This work demonstrates that the immune system harbored by the phage is fully functional and adaptive.

"Virtually all bacteria can be infected by phages. About half of the world's known bacteria have this adaptive immune system, called CRISPR/Cas, which is used primarily to provide immunity against phages. Although this immune system was commandeered by the phage, its origin remains unknown because the cholera bacterium itself currently lacks this system. What is really remarkable is that the immune system is being used by the phage to adapt to and overcome the defense systems of the cholera bacteria. Finding a CRISPR/Cas system in a phage shows that there is gene flow between the phage and bacteria even for something as large and complex as the genes for an adaptive immune system," said Seed.

"The study lends credence to the controversial idea that viruses are living creatures, and bolsters the possibility of using phage therapy to treat bacterial infections, especially those that are resistant to antibiotic treatment," said Camilli, professor of Molecular Biology & Microbiology at Tufts University School of Medicine and member of the Molecular Microbiology program faculty at the Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences at Tufts University.

Camilli's previous research established that phages are highly prevalent in stool samples from patients with cholera, implying that phage therapy is happening naturally and could be made more effective. In addition, a study published by Camilli in 2008 determined that phage therapy works in a mouse model of cholera intestinal infection.

The team is currently working on a study to understand precisely how the phage immune system disables the defense systems of the cholera bacteria. This new knowledge will be important for understanding whether the phage's immune system could overcome newly acquired or evolved phage defense systems of the cholera bacteria, and thus has implications for designing an effective and stable phage therapy to combat cholera.

Additional authors are David W. Lazinski, Ph.D., senior research associate in the Camilli lab at Tufts University School of Medicine, and Stephen B. Calderwood, M.D., Morton N. Swartz, M.D. academy professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, and chief, division of infectious disease and vice-chair, department of medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01AI55058, R01AI045746, and R01AI058935.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Tufts University.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Kimberley D. Seed, David W. Lazinski, Stephen B. Calderwood, Andrew Camilli. A bacteriophage encodes its own CRISPR/Cas adaptive response to evade host innate immunity. Nature, 2013; 494 (7438): 489 DOI: 10.1038/nature11927

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/strange_science/~3/Wyf-HIQF99Q/130227134334.htm

george clooney arrested ravi leigh espn greg oden st patricks day st. bonaventure

The Engadget Podcast is live tonight at 3:30PM!

Yeah, we're on a bit earlier today. Some of us have families to get back to, after all. Yeesh. Also, we just couldn't wait to talk about all of the news that's come out of Mobile World Congress in the past week. Join Tim, Brian and our old/new colleague Peter Rojas at 3:30 sharp(ish) just after the break.

February 28, 2013 3:30 PM EST

Filed under:

Comments

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/8buflk-8x0o/

gawker earthquake today earthquake today Romney Bosses Day 2012 Arlen Specter Winsor McCay

iTunes in the Cloud looks to be hitting more of Europe with TV series, films

iTunes in the Cloud looks to be hitting parts of Europe with TV series, films

While stateside users might complain that we get all the good stuff in Europe first, Apple's iTunes in the Cloud for movies and TV shows has finally got around to rolling in to France and other parts of Europe, eons after it came out in the US. We confirmed that the new functionality works in France, which lets you buy films and TV shows from a computer, Apple TV or iOS device, then download it for free from the cloud on another. Others have reported by Twitter that it's working in Holland and Sweden as well, making it the first big move for the service since it rolled into the UK, Australia and Canada last summer. Until now, users in those nations were only able to download books, apps and music purchased in iTunes from the cloud. There's still no word from Apple about the move, however, and the list of supported countries hasn't been updated for those features -- so we'll enjoy it for now and hope Cupertino doesn't change its mind.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: TNW

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/CemiZA10SDs/

citizens bank Hansel and Gretel LGBT Giovanna Plowman martin luther king jr quotes Inauguration 2013 Tony Gonzalez

Why March 1 isn't Congress's last chance to amend 'sequester' cuts

True, $85 billion in spending cuts kick in on March 1, but they won't be widely felt for several weeks. Meanwhile, funding for government operations expires March 27. The two fiscal issues could be rolled into one, but a top GOP appropriator sees that as a recipe for disaster.?

By David Grant,?Staff writer / February 27, 2013

Rep. Hal Rogers, R-Kentucky, testifies in front of a Senate panel in Frankfort, Ky., in 2011. Rogers is determined not to conflate the sequester cuts and the government-funding bills ? and early signs are that Democrats in Congress may, warily, go along with that.

Ed Reinke/AP

Enlarge

Talk about your March madness. Two whirling-dervish fiscal issues are bearing down on Washington, and a couple of March deadlines mean that next month is likely to determine whether dealmaking will give Americans a breather from tax-and-spending fights ? or whether intractability results in a federal government shutdown.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

A key question is whether these two issues ? 1) the much-maligned ?sequester? and 2) funds to run the government for the second half of the fiscal year ? will proceed on separate tracks, or merge onto one. The fuzzy expectation is that they?ll merge, and that the task of replacing the first with something better will be absorbed into second. Call it a two-fer.

But some say such a merger risks yet another fiscal battle royale ? including the possibility that the sequester?s crimp on the economy would be followed by something much worse.

To head off doubling down on crisis, House Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers (R) of Kentucky is working to keep the two fiscal issues as far apart as possible.

?He thinks sequestration cuts alone are terrible,? said a Republican House aide familiar with Chairman Rogers? thinking. ?Having a full government shutdown on top of that would be more than the nation could bear.?

Let?s backtrack for a moment, just to make sure everyone?s clear about the March itinerary.

First up, on March 1, is the sequester, that package of $85 billion in automatic spending cuts that has created a buzz about looming air-travel delays, cuts in student aid, furloughs for defense workers, fewer detentions of illegal immigrants, limited access to national parks, and so on. Though almost no one likes the sequester?s across-the-board approach to the cuts, it looks as if Congress will not agree upon a different way to come up with the $85 billion by the end of this month.

But the nation will get a little grace period before most effects of sequestration are felt. That?s because government employees being furloughed need to receive roughly a month?s notice and because some military spending can likely be jostled around to prevent deep disruptions for a few weeks. Hence, lawmakers are expected to begin serious negotiations during the first two weeks of March to adjust ??or perhaps even replace ? the sequester.

Meanwhile, funds to operate the government run out on March 27, the midpoint of the fiscal year. Congress needs to appropriate money to the various agencies and departments or, voil?, a shutdown. But how much money is always the rub. Lately, Congress has been opting to simply continue funding at levels set by the 2011 debt-ceiling deal, the Budget Control Act.

It?s not a giant leap of logic to see that any revised package of sequester cuts could be rolled into bills designed to keep the government?s lights on for the rest of the fiscal year ? the very period over which the first of the sequester cuts will take effect. Such reasoning leads Pete Davis of Davis Capital Investment Ideas, a former staff member of the Senate Budget Committee, to proclaim that March 27 is ?the real deadline? for Washington?s sequester decisions.

?If there?s a deal to fund the government? through Sept. 30, says Mr. Davis, ?it?s almost a no-brainer to add a sequester replacement to it.?

But Rogers, for one, is determined not to conflate the sequester cuts and the government-funding bills ? and early signs are that Democrats in Congress may, warily, go along with that.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/u6YuP5ONCAM/Why-March-1-isn-t-Congress-s-last-chance-to-amend-sequester-cuts

babe ruth new jersey nets nba playoff schedule rondo morris claiborne mothers day gifts clippers